Commure Up Close: Megan Fulker on Grit, Ownership, and Partnerships That Last

Patients now shop for care the way they shop for everything else. They compare, they read reviews, and they leave when the experience frustrates them. A 2024 Deloitte survey of US health care consumers found that about 24% are willing to switch doctors just to get access to virtual care options.

That pressure has a name in healthcare strategy: the digital front door. And the market behind it is growing fast. Mordor Intelligence projects the digital front door market will expand from about $31.66 billion in 2026 to $82.25 billion by 2031.

For health system leaders, the question is how to build a digital front door that works. This guide covers what a digital front door is, the four components that make it up, why your patients expect one, and how to evaluate a platform.

What is a digital front door in healthcare?

A digital front door is the set of connected digital tools a health system uses to guide patients from their first interaction through scheduling, intake, communication, and ongoing care. It gives patients one consistent way to find care, book it, prepare for it, and stay connected after.

Think of it as the digital equivalent of walking up to the front desk, except it spans every step before, during, and after a visit. A patient might search for a provider, book online, complete intake on their phone, get reminders by text, and message the care team once they're home.

Done well, a digital front door connects these moments so patients don't have to repeat themselves or chase down information.

The four components of a digital front door

A digital front door is made up of four capabilities that work together. When health systems buy them as separate point solutions, they tend to create friction rather than remove it.

Patient scheduling and access

This is the most visible component, and often the first thing patients judge you on. Online self-scheduling lets patients book, reschedule, and cancel without calling a line that may sit on hold for several minutes. The advent of AI voice agents is also helping to ease the load on hospital staff while giving patients who prefer to speak to somebody an avenue to schedule care.

Scheduling sets the tone. A patient who can book in 90 seconds at 11 p.m. has a very different first impression than one stuck in a phone tree.

Patient intake

Once an appointment is booked, intake collects the information clinicians need before the patient arrives. Digital intake moves registration, insurance details, and clinical history off the clipboard and onto the patient's phone.

This is one of the highest-ROI components, because it cuts front-desk data entry and shortens waiting room time. We covered the shift in depth in our look at how AI is replacing the clipboard at patient intake.

Patient communication

Communication runs across the entire journey: appointment reminders, prep instructions, billing notices, and two-way messaging with the care team. Patients expect this on the channels they already use, mostly text and email.

Omnichannel, HIPAA-compliant messaging keeps patients informed and cuts inbound call volume.

Care navigation

Care navigation guides patients to the right next step, whether that's a specialist referral, a follow-up, or a post-discharge check-in. This is where a digital front door earns its keep over time.

Automated care pathways and reminders keep patients on track between visits, which is where most no-shows and care gaps happen. Our piece on AI-powered care journeys and no-show reduction walks through how this works in practice.

Why health systems need a digital front door

Three forces are pushing this from nice-to-have to expected.

First, patient expectations. Banking and retail have trained patients to expect 24/7 self-service, and they apply that standard to healthcare. Not to mention, when a patient is seeking care, they are likely in a vulnerable position and need help right away.

Second, competition for patients. Retail clinics, virtual-first providers, and large systems with mature digital tools are all chasing the same patients. A clunky access experience sends them elsewhere.

Third, operational pressure. Staffing shortages and rising costs mean phone and paper-based access doesn't scale. Digital tools (such as AI call center agents) absorb routine work so staff can focus on patients who need a human.

No-shows, abandoned appointment requests, and leakage to competitors all cost revenue. A working digital front door recovers some of that by making it easy for patients to start and stay in care with you.

How to evaluate a digital front door platform

Once you decide to invest, the build-versus-buy and single-platform-versus-point-solution questions matter more than any feature checklist. Four criteria separate platforms that work from those that create new silos.

EHR integration. The platform has to write back to your system of record. If scheduling, intake, and messaging data don't flow into the EHR, you've added work instead of removing it.

A unified platform. Patients feel it when scheduling, intake, and communication come from three different vendors. One platform covering all four components gives patients a consistent experience and gives you one place to manage it.

Omnichannel, compliant communication. Look for SMS, voice, and email in one place, with HIPAA-compliant messaging built in rather than bolted on.

Measurable outcomes. Ask vendors for proof: no-show reduction, response rates, staff time saved. Yale New Haven Health, for example, cut no-show and same-day cancellation rates by 54% in a breast imaging program built on this kind of outreach.

Frequently asked questions

Is a digital front door the same as a patient portal?

A patient portal is one piece of a digital front door, usually focused on records and messaging for patients who are already established. A digital front door is broader. It covers how new and returning patients find and book care in the first place.

What's the first component to prioritize?

Most systems start with scheduling and intake, since those touch every patient and show fast results in reduced phone volume and front-desk work. Communication and care navigation build on that foundation.

Who should own the digital front door in a health system?

Ownership usually sits across several teams, which is part of why these projects stall. Marketing cares about patient acquisition, operations cares about access and staffing, and IT owns the EHR. The systems that succeed name one owner or steering group with authority across all three, so the experience doesn't fragment by department.

Building your digital front door

Patients form an opinion about your health system before they ever meet a clinician. The digital front door is where that opinion starts, and it runs through every step that follows: how they book, how they check in, how they hear from you, and how they find their way to the next visit.

Commure Engage brings scheduling, intake, communication, and care navigation into one platform connected to your EHR, so patients get one front door instead of four. See how it fits your access strategy.

Explore Commure Engage

Every clinician knows the feeling. Packed schedule, patient about to walk in, and you're scrambling through charts trying to piece together context. All of this quietly contributes to burnout before the day has even started.

That pre-visit scramble is exactly what I set out to solve.

Patient 360 and the Pre-Visit Summary

At Commure, we've been building toward Patient 360 (a a knowledge engine  that unifies all of a patient's data into a single clinical picture: active problems, current treatments, care history, and open follow-ups), and surfaces them at the moment they matter most.

Pre-Visit Summary is the first major feature built on top of Patient 360. A few weeks ago, we released it to over a thousand providers across multiple specialties. The response has been overwhelming.

A primary care physician put it simply: "Patient 360 gave me exactly what I needed to prep for the visit. The right level of patient-centered information surfaced at the right time. The reminders on incomplete tests were especially valuable."

And from an orthopedic surgeon, right before a busy clinic: "It gave me exactly the information I needed and saved me several minutes of going into the charts. Providers who normally wouldn't use AI tools are now gravitating towards this."

Built by Clinicians, for Clinicians

Leaning on my experience as a physician, I led the clinical strategy for this project.

Drawing on my own clinical judgment, I consulted physicians across specialties, validated the design against real workflows, and iterated with our Commure  Clinical Council, Commure’s internal body of clinicians. All of this reinforced the central principle of our work: understanding a patient's key care considerations is foundational to establishing a therapeutic alliance. That's why the summary surfaces not only information about labs, medications, and other aspects of the current treatment, but also interactions with other providers and other significant life contexts. A provider walking into a room should know what else is going on in that patient's world.

Our goal for providers was simple: be able to glance through patient information in two to three minutes and walk in fully prepared, including what's still open, what needs follow-up, and where there are gaps that need reconciliation.

A Good AI Product Rests on a Good Data Strategy

We believe clinicians should drive data strategy because they know which information matters most and where it comes from. So physicians and clinicians at Commure led the work of defining a data hierarchy framework to determine what gets surfaced, in what order, and why.

That hierarchy had to solve for three things simultaneously: relevance (what an orthopedic surgeon needs differs from what a cardiologist needs), recency (information had to reflect the patient's current state), and longitudinal coherence (surfacing how a condition has evolved over time, not just a snapshot).

‍This wasn't a technical exercise with clinical input bolted on at the end. It was clinical thinking embedded into the architecture of the product itself.

This Is What Clinician-Led AI Looks Like

There's a version of AI in healthcare that automates tasks. And then there's a version that understands clinical workflow, anticipates what a provider needs, and surfaces it at exactly the right moment.

Pre-Visit Summary is the latter. But beyond reducing burden, what excites me about this project is its potential for patient impact. When providers are well-prepared, continuity of care improves. Nothing falls through the cracks and they can deliver better care while taking better care of themselves.

Anthropic released its first generally available Mythos-class model, Fable 5, a new tier of AI that sits above every previous frontier model. For the first time, the most advanced and capable class of AI models ever built was designed with clinical and operational healthcare work in mind.

Commure has done the security, compliance, and architecture work to deploy Mythos-class models within our healthcare-grade environment, and we now have the ability to apply them across the Commure platform.

What this class of model does for healthcare workflows

The defining trait of Mythos-class AI models is endurance. They sustain long, complex, tasks far beyond what previous generations could hold together, and they are measurably more reliable across the multi-step workflows healthcare operations run on. 

Voice and call center agents. A patient call is a long-horizon reasoning problem: understand an unwell or frustrated caller, identify intent, navigate scheduling within the EHR, recover when the conversation jumps tracks, and know when a human should take over. Each underlying model generation improves the weakest link in that chain, which is sustained multi-turn reasoning under ambiguity. Mythos-class models are the largest single improvement to that link yet.

‍Patient intake. Intake agents gather history, reconcile it against the chart, follow clinically validated pathways, and hand the clinician a summary worth reading. High-fidelity synthesis of patient records and care histories is precisely where this model class excels, and the longer and messier the intake, the bigger its advantage.

‍
‍Autonomous coding and revenue cycle. Producing correct CPT, ICD-10, and modifiers from documentation is dense, rules-heavy reasoning where small errors compound into denials. The frontier labs now consider this work important enough to benchmark: the newest evaluations in the model's own system card include prior authorization, denials and appeals, and DME orders, executed across simulated EHR and payer-portal environments. Cleaner coding upstream means fewer denials downstream and lower cost-to-collect.

‍

Measured on healthcare work

Mythos-class models are state-of-the-art on nearly all tested benchmarks of AI capability, spanning software engineering, knowledge work, vision, and scientific research. Healthcare has rigorous benchmarks of its own, and the new model class was evaluated on them directly.

HealthBench Professional tests real provider workflows. It is built from 525 conversations authored by practicing physicians, spanning clinical consults, documentation, and research tasks, each graded against physician-written criteria. A model's score reflects whether its clinical reasoning and documentation would hold up in front of the clinician who wrote the task.

HealthBench tests how a model handles patients. It grades 5,000 multi-turn patient conversations across 26 medical specialties against more than 48,000 expert-written rubric items, measuring safety, accuracy, and communication in realistic healthcare contexts. This is the benchmark closest to what a patient-facing agent does all day.

In physician-authored clinical work, Fable 5 Mythos-class scores nine points above the previous flagship (Opus 4.8) and fourteen above GPT-5.5. 

The Next Frontier of Agentic AI for Healthcare

These gains represent a fundamental shift in what agents can handle on their own, enabling more complex, multistep use cases that previously required human intervention at every turn. With Commure's deep healthcare expertise, data integration, and infrastructure, we can deploy these models in clinical settings at an even higher level of performance.

Apply the latest frontier models today

Mythos-class capability is now part of the Commure platform. If you are a current customer, you are already set as you keep the same deployment, workflows, and integrations. If you are not yet a customer, this is a good week to see what an LLM-native platform can do. 

‍

Tell us a little bit about yourself—what do you like to do outside of work?

I am a family man first and foremost. I've been married five years, have a son, and have another baby boy on the way. We recently relocated down to San Diego from the Bay Area and love it out here. Outside of spending time with family, I'm a huge sports enthusiast. There are not many days where you won’t see some sports event on the TV.  Also, like staying active, golf is my game of choice and you'll find me on the course on weekends whenever I can sneak away.

As a kid, what did you want to be when you grew up?

A professional athlete, without a doubt. The dream was alive and well.

Describe a day in the life of your role.

No two days look the same, which is what I love about it. My role in Strategic Partnerships means I'm constantly connecting with external organizations, individuals, and clinics, identifying opportunities that can move the needle on our growth, and working with eng, ops, and other internal teams to bring those partnerships to life. It's part relationship-building, part strategy, and part execution/closing, and I genuinely enjoy all three.

What made you decide to join Commure?

I've spent the last 10 years in healthcare, starting on the med device side, and I reached a point where I wanted to feel like I had a direct hand in shaping the future of healthcare rather than just being another cog in the machine. Having family members in the medical field also made it personal. Knowing that the work we do here can make their lives easier and improve the system they work in every day and, in turn, provide better care to patients was a huge motivator for me. Joining Athelas/Commure gave me exactly that opportunity and it was too compelling to pass up.

How would you describe the Commure company culture?

Builders and meritocracy. Full stop. Everywhere you look, you see people coming in, building something real, and being rewarded for it. Career growth happens here at a pace you simply wouldn't find anywhere else. It pushes you to develop faster, think bigger, and take ownership in ways that permanently change how you work.

What advice would you give someone on their first day at Commure?

I have two, first, be a sponge. There are incredibly smart, talented, and successful people around you so learn from them, ask questions, observe, and absorb everything. Second, don't be shy about spotting areas for improvement. Fresh eyes are valuable, and if you see a way to make something better, speak up. That kind of initiative is noticed and welcomed here.

What has been your greatest accomplishment so far at Commure?

Being here from day one of selling RCM and growing into a role where I've managed teams across RCM and Scribe, and now working on strategic partnerships for our entire platform that are helping shape our GTM motion, is something I'm really proud of. It's been a full-circle journey, and the fact that I've had a hand in building something from the ground up at every stage makes it all the more meaningful.
‍

Interested in a career building the next generation of healthcare technology powered by AI? We are always looking for talented people across our departments.

Explore Career Opportunities

In healthcare, what gets documented gets paid for. What doesn't, doesn't.

That simple equation is why clinical documentation improvement (CDI, also known as clinical documentation integrity) has become one of the most consequential disciplines inside modern health systems. CDI sits at the intersection of clinical care, coding accuracy, regulatory compliance, and revenue. When it works, hospitals get paid appropriately for the care they deliver. Quality scores reflect reality. Clinicians spend less time chasing queries.

When it doesn't, the costs compound, resulting in denied claims, underpayments, distorted quality metrics, and frustrated providers.

The discipline isn't new. But the way leading health systems approach it is changing fast. The traditional CDI playbook was built around manual chart reviews and retrospective physician queries, designed for an era of paper records and fee-for-service billing. AI is rewriting that playbook.

Here's what CDI is, why it matters more than ever, and how AI is changing the way health systems approach documentation.

What is clinical documentation improvement?

Clinical documentation improvement is the practice of making sure a patient's medical record accurately reflects their clinical condition, the care they received, and the medical decision-making behind it. Done well, CDI bridges the gap between clinical reality and what eventually shows up on a claim form.

A traditional CDI program runs on certified specialists, usually nurses or coders with additional credentials. They review patient charts, identify gaps or ambiguities, and submit queries to physicians for clarification. They work alongside medical coders to make sure diagnoses are documented with the specificity required for accurate ICD-10 and CPT coding, that complications and comorbidities (CCs and MCCs) are captured, and that the final claim reflects the true acuity of the patient.

AHIMA's guidance for CDI programs frames the discipline as foundational to accurate reporting under CMS quality measures, value-based purchasing, and DRG-based payment.

Documentation determines whether a chart reflects the full acuity of a patient, and that distinction often drives thousands of dollars per case in reimbursement. A patient documented with a major complication or comorbidity (MCC) can generate more than double the payment of an otherwise identical chart without one. The clinical reality is the same. The documentation is what changes the number.

A peer-reviewed study in the Journal of Vascular Surgery found that a physician-led CDI initiative significantly increased the case mix index and contribution margin. That finding has been replicated across specialties and care settings.

This is also why CDI is foundational to revenue cycle management. Coding, claim submission, denials prevention, reimbursement: they all depend on documentation that meets payer and regulatory standards, with CDI sitting upstream of all of it.

Why clinical documentation improvement matters

CDI isn't a back-office function. Its impact shows up in three places every health system executive cares about: revenue, quality, and clinician experience.

Financial impact. Strong CDI programs have a direct line to the bottom line. AHIMA's Clinical Documentation Improvement Toolkit identifies CDI as one of the most effective levers a hospital has for reducing denials, capturing severity of illness and risk of mortality, and securing appropriate reimbursement. Health systems using modern CDI tooling embedded in EHR workflows have seen revenue gains of up to 3% when documentation gaps are flagged in real time. For an enterprise health system, 3 points of net patient revenue could be the difference between hitting and missing a year.

Clinical quality and risk adjustment. Documentation determines how the outside world sees a hospital's quality. Mortality indices, publicly reported outcomes, case mix index (CMI), and risk-adjusted payment under value-based contracts all flow from what gets documented. CMS continues to expand value-based care arrangements, which makes precise documentation a revenue, quality, and contractual question all at once.

Regulatory complexity. The documentation bar keeps rising. The WHO's ICD-11 update introduced roughly 17,000 new diagnostic categories, and the 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule ties more of reimbursement to documentation precision. The global CDI market is projected to grow from $4.88 billion in 2024 to $10.44 billion by 2034, a clear signal that health systems recognize the cost of getting documentation wrong.

The pressure is increasing right when CDI capacity is shrinking. Two-thirds of HIM leaders cite staffing shortfalls that directly impact revenue integrity, and the workforce of qualified CDI specialists isn't expanding fast enough to close the gap.

The problem with the traditional CDI model

The old CDI playbook is running out of road for one fundamental reason. It relies on humans reviewing charts after the fact, and there aren't enough humans to do it.

Clinicians are already drowning in documentation. Research from Annals of Family Medicine and cited by the AMA shows that physicians spend 5.9 hours of an 11.4-hour workday in the EHR. An AJMC analysis found 76.1% of office-based physicians spend more than an hour per day documenting outside clinic hours, averaging nearly 2 hours of "pajama time" daily. The AMA identifies clinical documentation as one of the leading contributors to physician burnout.

Layering more retrospective queries onto already-burned-out physicians is a tax. And it's a tax that traditional CDI programs depend on to function.

How AI is reshaping clinical documentation improvement

The real shift in CDI isn't faster query workflows or better dashboards. It's that AI moves documentation improvement from a retrospective discipline to a real-time one.

Ambient AI captures the clinical picture as it happens. A clinician used to dictate a stripped-down note after the visit, then a CDI specialist would query for missing details days later. With ambient AI listening to the encounter, structuring the note in real time, and surfacing CareCues during the visit itself, the documentation gap closes before it opens.

AI-assisted CDI expands specialist capacity. According to MedLearn Publishing's analysis of AI in clinical documentation integrity, CDI specialists augmented by intelligent systems can manage 35–45% larger chart volumes, which lets organizations expand CDI coverage without proportional staffing increases. The same analysis reports 12–18% denial reductions for complex inpatient stays and 20–25% reductions on prior authorization submissions when AI-assisted CDI is deployed at scale.

Autonomous coding closes the loop from documentation to claim. When documentation is captured cleanly in real time, AI can generate accurate CPT codes, ICD-10 diagnoses, and modifiers directly from the clinical note. In a deployment with Ob Hospitalist Group, Commure's Autonomous Coding generated 85% of CPT and ICD-10 codes and reduced charge entry time by 83%. At a leading NYC health system, the combination of ambient documentation, charge note reconciliation, and autonomous coding drove a 20% increase in monthly charges and cut late-filing denials in half.

These gains reflect a different operating model for CDI, one where documentation improvement is built into the workflow itself instead of bolted on afterward.

What to look for in a modern CDI approach

For health system leaders evaluating where CDI is headed, four questions matter:

1. Is documentation improved in real time or retrospectively? Real-time intervention prevents errors. Retrospective intervention chases them.
2. Is the system EHR-integrated or bolted on? CDI that requires clinicians to switch contexts or duplicate work won't get adopted.
3. Does it connect documentation to coding to claims? The biggest gains come from treating the documentation-to-reimbursement pipeline as one continuous workflow instead of three disconnected ones.
4. Is it built for enterprise scale? Pilots are easy. Sustained CDI improvement across hundreds of providers and dozens of specialties is the real test.

The health systems pulling ahead on documentation today are rebuilding CDI around AI that works at the point of care and connects clinical documentation directly to the revenue cycle

The U.S. healthcare industry could save $20 billion a year by replacing manual administrative workflows with electronic ones, according to the latest CAQH Index. The same shift saves 70 minutes per patient visit.

That's the cost of the clipboard era. And for the first time, the technology to end it actually exists.

For two decades, "patient intake software" meant the same thing: take the paper forms, put them on a tablet. The clipboard got a screen, but patients still answered the same questions. Staff still re-keyed the same data, but eligibility still got checked somewhere downstream, usually by phone.

The clipboard didn't go away. It just got a software wrapper.

AI changes the assumption underneath all of it by replacing the workflows the form was built to support.

The clipboard era costs more than most health systems realize

Patient intake is one of the most measured workflows in healthcare and one of the least scrutinized. Most enterprise health systems track no-show rates, registration time, and front-end denials as separate metrics, but they rarely add them up.

When they do, the picture is consistent. The manual pre-visit experience bleeds revenue, staff hours, and patient trust at every step.

CAQH's 70-minutes-per-visit figure is the cumulative cost of staff calling patients to confirm appointments, re-verifying insurance by phone, fielding follow-up questions about pre-visit prep, and re-entering the same data into multiple systems. Multiply that across a health system's daily patient volume, and those minutes turn into a full-time staffing burden that grows with every new clinic and every new payer contract.

The patient side is worse. Patients show up to fill out the same forms they already completed online. They wait while staff verifies what should have been verified the week before. They leave with the impression that the most technologically advanced industry in the world can't remember their address from one visit to the next.

This is the gap modern patient intake software has to close.

What AI patient intake actually does

The shift is a redefinition of what patient intake software is responsible for.

In the clipboard era, intake software's job was to collect information at the front desk. In the AI era, the job is to manage the entire pre-visit experience. From the moment an appointment is scheduled to when the patient walks in already verified, prepared, and registered.

That broader definition matters because it changes what health systems are actually buying. A traditional intake product replaces the form. An AI-powered patient engagement platform replaces the workflow. The first reduces clicks. The second reduces phone calls, no-shows, denied claims, and the staff hours required to chase each one of them down.

In practice, AI-driven patient intake covers four overlapping capabilities:

• Automated, conversational outreach that confirms the appointment, gathers pre-visit information, and answers patient questions in plain language over SMS or voice. No portal, no app, no login.
  
  
• Intelligent referral intake that captures and tracks incoming referrals so patients don't fall through the cracks between schedule and visit.
  
  
• Personalized pre-procedure preparation that delivers the right instructions at the right time and flags patients who haven't completed them.
  
  
• Bi-directional messaging with intelligent triage that escalates urgent issues to a human and resolves the routine ones automatically.

Each of these used to be a separate vendor conversation. Now they're table stakes for a single platform.

Why the AI layer changes the economics

The most underappreciated thing about AI-driven patient intake is that in addition to reducing manual work, it changes which work is worth doing at all.

When pre-visit confirmation, prep, and information capture happen automatically through conversational AI, the marginal cost of engaging each patient drops close to zero. That unlocks workflows that health systems couldn't justify before. Multi-touchpoint reminders for complex procedures. Proactive outreach that meaningfully reduces no-shows. Bowel prep follow-ups for colonoscopies. Pre-op education for orthopedic patients. Behavioral health check-ins before the first visit.

The AI layer also reaches places the clipboard never could. Voice-based agents can capture patient information during inbound and outbound calls (which is still the channel where most patients engage with their health system). The same AI that confirms an appointment can spot a patient who needs to reschedule, triage a clinical question, or hand off to a human when escalation is warranted. Modern call center automation extends intake into a 24/7 capability.

The financial picture changes with it. The clipboard era measured intake as a cost center. The AI era measures it as a lever for access, throughput, denial prevention, and retention. The systems already operating this way are seeing the math play out. At Yale New Haven Health, pre-appointment AI texting drove a 54% reduction in no-show and cancellation rates for breast cancer screening alone.

What enterprise buyers should look for in 2026

The patient intake software market is in the middle of a category shift. The products that win the next decade won't be the products that won the last one.

A few principles separate the AI-era platforms from the legacy ones.

• Platform breadth over form depth. The right question is no longer how good the digital forms are. It's how much of the pre-visit experience the platform actually owns. A vendor that handles intake but not referral management, or messaging but not scheduling coordination, is selling only a piece of the workflow when health systems need the whole thing.
  
  
• Retrieval-based AI, not generative guessing. In healthcare, an AI that hallucinates a medication or a pre-op instruction is a safety event. Enterprise-grade patient intake AI has to be grounded in clinically validated content and deterministic logic.
  
  
• Deep EHR integration as table stakes. Patient data that enters the platform should land in the EHR in the right fields, without staff re-keying. Bi-directional integration with the major EHRs separates platforms that look modern from platforms that actually reduce work.
  
  
• Omnichannel by patient preference. SMS, RCS, voice, and email. Meeting patients on the channel they actually use, not the channel the vendor built first.

Health systems making this transition are replacing the entire pre-visit stack with one platform built for the AI era.

How Commure Engage approaches patient intake

Commure Engage is built for the shift from clipboard to AI. It combines automated patient outreach, conversational AI, referral and intake management, and personalized care pathways into one platform that owns the pre-visit experience end to end.

Engage uses retrieval-based AI grounded in over 500 clinically validated care pathways, integrates bi-directionally with all major EHRs, and reaches patients through SMS, RCS, voice, and email without requiring an app or portal login. Health systems using Engage resolve 80%+ of patient inquiries automatically through conversational workflows, increase outreach capacity by 6.5x, and cut no-shows by 54%.

The clipboard era is ending. The platforms replacing it are already in production.

See how Commure Engage is rebuilding patient intake for the AI era

We're excited to announce that Commure Ambient AI offers complete, end-to-end integration with Cerner, bringing ambient documentation directly into the workflows clinicians already rely on, with no context switching, no copy-paste, and no duplicate charting.

Documentation that meets clinicians where they work

Clinicians have spent too long absorbing the cost of fragmented documentation tools, toggling between systems, retyping notes, and losing precious face time with patients to administrative work. Commure Ambient closes that gap inside Cerner.

With this integration, patient context flows automatically from Cerner into Commure Ambient, and finished notes sync back exactly where they belong (into DynDoc components or PowerNote). Clinicians can then review, finalize, and sign directly in PowerChart.

A connected workflow, from waiting room to signed note

The integration is built around the way clinicians actually work:

• Select Patient — Choose from ambulatory appointments, the patient list, or walk-ins.
• Pre-Chart — View patient context and pre-visit summaries inside a DynDoc template or the Commure app.
• Record Visit — Ambient capture is tied to the specific encounter, with real-time transcription.
• Review Note — AI-generated, structured notes ready for provider review and edits.
• EHR Sync — Draft sections flow automatically into DynDoc components or PowerNote.
• Sign in Cerner — Finalize and sign directly in PowerChart, with no duplicate entry.

Personalized for every clinician, optimized for every care setting

Commure Ambient adapts to how each provider documents, at both the speciality and individual provider level. Teams can configure output by care setting, save edited notes as reusable templates, and control how prior notes carry forward across orthopaedics, psychiatry, internal medicine, GI, OB/GYN, cardiology, and more.

Whether you're documenting in inpatient and hospitalist settings, the emergency department, or ambulatory, Commure Ambient is purpose-built for the full hospital environment.

Trusted at scale

Commure Ambient is already in use at more than 2,000 sites of care and 135 of the largest health systems in the country, including HCA and Tenet. This Cerner integration extends that reach, bringing complete ambient AI documentation to even more clinicians, with the depth of integration that real clinical workflows demand.

Ready to see Commure Ambient in your Cerner environment?

Ask any nurse what they spend their shift doing, and documentation will land somewhere near the top of the list. A 2025 study published in JMIR Nursing found that nurses spend an average of 31% of a 12-hour shift documenting in flowsheets alone, and that's before accounting for narrative notes, handoffs, or the charting that spills over after a shift ends.

That number tells us something important: nursing documentation isn't a smaller version of physician documentation. It's a fundamentally different workflow challenge. And as ambient AI adoption moves from providers to nurses, the vendors, health systems, and clinical leaders who recognize that difference are the ones who will thrive.

We sat down with Kelum Fecht, Enterprise Sales Director at Commure and a nurse by training, to talk about what makes nursing documentation distinct, where ambient AI can move the needle, and what it actually takes to build a solution that works.

Documentation doesn't clock in and out

When a physician sees a patient, the documentation work is concentrated around a 20- to 30-minute encounter with some pre- and post-charting on either side. Nursing doesn't work that way.

"In a 12-hour shift, that burden is there constantly," Kelum told us. A nurse might be caring for up to nine patients at once, returning to each one repeatedly, fielding interruptions, and capturing information across hundreds of small interactions. The frequency is higher, the conversations are more varied, and the documentation lives in flowsheets, which Kelum describes as "an Excel spreadsheet with dropdowns, radial buttons, and free text", rather than narrative notes.

That structural difference is why bolting nursing onto an existing physician ambient AI tool doesn't work. And the cost of getting it wrong shows up in places that don't always make it into the ROI deck.

"When a nurse should be checking out at 7 p.m. after a 12-hour shift, if they're not done with documentation, they're often spending another 30 minutes to an hour after handoff going back in to make sure everything's charted, and that overtime is real dollars for healthcare organizations."

This documentation bottleneck quickly becomes a retention, safety, and margin problem all at once.

Why ambient AI for nursing and why now

Health systems have tried to solve nursing documentation before. Workstations on wheels, bedside computers, mobile devices; each one promised to bring documentation closer to the point of care, but none of them addressed the underlying tension.

"Patient comes first, patient first always. So even the nurses that are most routine at being able to pull up their computer, their workstation on wheels, or whatever technology platform they have, there is still always that burden of how do I document while I'm taking care of a patient."

Ambient AI is the first technology with a credible answer: capture the conversation, generate the documentation, and let the nurse keep their eyes on the patient. The biggest immediate wins, Kelum believes, are in shift handoffs (where critical context routinely gets lost between nurses) and in admission and shift assessments (where the structure of the interaction maps cleanly to what Ambient AI can capture).

There's also a second-order benefit that mirrors what we've seen on the physician side: when clinicians narrate their care out loud, patients get more information, and nurses surface details that would otherwise stay locked in their heads.

When we asked Kelum how ambient AI changes what it means to be a nurse over the next three to five years, his answer reframed the question:

"It doesn't change anything because it makes nursing what it's always meant to be. What we as nurses always learn is to care for the patient, understand the patient, and be an advisor to the patient. Ambient AI can only strengthen that because enabling nurses to spend more one-on-one time having conversations and having eye contact during their care, that's what nursing was a hundred years ago, before EMRs and all this technology was thrown in front of us."

The integration problem most vendors haven't solved

Generating a note from a recorded conversation has become table stakes. What hasn't is generating the right documentation in the right place inside the EHR, especially for nursing.

"Generating a note is easy. Generating a high-quality note is challenging."

Physician notes can often be written back through a handful of API fields. Nursing flowsheets are a different beast: structured grids, discrete data elements, and EHR-specific quirks. Any vendor serious about nursing ambient AI has to engineer for all of them and engineer it deeply enough that the integration holds up across shift changes, edge cases, and the realities of a 12-hour day.

That's why we're co-developing Commure's ambient AI for nursing alongside health systems rather than shipping a finished product and asking nurses to adapt. The workflows that matter are best designed with nurses at the table, not after the fact.

Beyond documentation

The same ambient layer that captures a conversation can power smart prompts, what we at Commure call CareCues (such as a reminder to follow up on a wound check), surface relevant orders a nurse hasn't seen yet (such as an MRI scheduled for a patient she's caring for), and automate communication between care team members who today rely on chasing each other down.

The throughline is the same one that drew Kelum to this work in the first place: give nurses back the time and attention that documentation has been quietly taking from them, and let them do the job they trained for.

Want to see what ambient AI for nursing looks like in your environment? Book a demo with the Commure Ambient AI team.